Legal Opinion

BMG Direct Marketing, Inc. v. Patrick Peake, Individually and as Representative of Others Similarly Situated

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2005No. 03-0547Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

Footnotes in HTML versions of opinions are designated by superscript “balloons” or boxes (click on either for the footnote text) and are not numbered. For an exact copy of the opinion, retrieve the Adobe PDF version.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

════════════

No. 03-0547

════════════

BMG Direct Marketing, Inc., Petitioner,

v.

Patrick Peake, Individually and as Representative of Others Similarly Situated, Respondent

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

On Petition for Review from the

Court of Appeals for the Ninth District of Texas

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Argued…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · O’Neill.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Fortune Production Co. v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. BernalTexas Supreme Court · 2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API