Legal Opinion
Hamel v. Allstate Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 26, 1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
233 N.J. Super. 502 (1989)
559 A.2d 455
JOANN HAMEL AND RICHARD HAMEL, HER HUSBAND, PER QUOD, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted April 25, 1989.
Decided May 26, 1989.
Before Judges ANTELL, DREIER and BROCHIN.
D'Amico & Cofone, attorneys for appellant (Bruce L. Magaw, on the brief).
Andrew S. Prince, attorney for respondents Hamel (Andrew S. Prince, on the brief).
Robert A. Auerbach, attorney for respondent Prudential Insurance Company (Randi S.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Crane v. BielskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Green v. StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Conduit Found. Corp. v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Lampley v. Davis MacH. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Intertech v. City of PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Marcangelo v. Boardwalk Regency Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Illinois National Insurance v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Smith v. Fireworks by Girone, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.