Garver v. State

*591ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORRISON, Judge.

Appellant, in a forceful motion for rehearing, has again urged as error the failure of the trial court to define principals, accomplices and accessories in his charge.

He restates his contention as follows:

The witness Daniell testified for the state that the appellant went into the burglarized building with him, while Officer Word, also a witness for the state, testified that he saw the appellant outside in a pickup truck. This, he said, raised an issue as to whether the appellant was a principal or an accomplice, and he contends that such issue should…