Legal Opinion

Fudge v. Seckner Contracting Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 26, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, for services. Trial in the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brextano, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for defendant by direction of the court. Appeal by plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sears

It is contended by counsel for appellant that the trial court erred in thus peremptorily directing a verdict.

In support of such contention it is urged, first, that the evidence would warrant a conclusion by the jury that Hatch was the agent of appellee, authorized to procure a broker, and that acting under such authority he did employ appellant; and, secondly, that if this were not so, yet the fact of Hatch being appellee’s agent to sell the bonds would warrant the employment of appellant as a sub-agent, and that such sub-agency was ratified by appellee.

The maintenance of one or the other of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paddock v. ColbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
  2. Corbett v. SchumackerIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sherwood Bros. v. Seattle Fruit & Produce Auction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API