Legal Opinion

Seligman v. Holladay

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1934No. 4810PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Judge.

Plaintiffs, the parents of the 7 year old Phyllis Rose Seligman, instituted this suit for and on behalf of their minor daughter to recover for injuries sustained by her as the result of being struck by an automobile driven by the 17 year old son of defendant Hol-laday, and also sued in their own behalf for medical bills they had incurred in treatment for said minor. Holladay and his insurer, the Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited, are made defendants.

Defendants excepted to the allegations in reference to the medical bills, alleging same were too vague and…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Holland v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Davies v. Consolidated UnderwritersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Hughes v. GillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Covey v. Marquette Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Bertrand v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API