State v. Asbury
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Dissent
TOAL, Justice:
The defendant Willie James Asbury appeals his convictions of murder and kidnapping, asserting, inter alia, that the court erred in refusing to suppress evidence improperly seized from Asbury’s home. I agree and must, therefore, dissent from the majority opinion.
*196On January 6, 1992, six officers went to Asbury’s trailer house to serve on him outstanding warrants and commitment orders unrelated to the present case. Asbury had been pinpointed as a suspect in the murder of Ezell Lawrence (“Victim”). The officers went to Asbury’s residence early in the morning. When they arrived, they…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.