Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Asbury

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 10, 1997No. 24712Published

1Dissent

TOAL, Justice:

The defendant Willie James Asbury appeals his convictions of murder and kidnapping, asserting, inter alia, that the court erred in refusing to suppress evidence improperly seized from Asbury’s home. I agree and must, therefore, dissent from the majority opinion.

*196On January 6, 1992, six officers went to Asbury’s trailer house to serve on him outstanding warrants and commitment orders unrelated to the present case. Asbury had been pinpointed as a suspect in the murder of Ezell Lawrence (“Victim”). The officers went to Asbury’s residence early in the morning. When they arrived, they…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API