Legal Opinion

in Re Ronald Wayne Schofield v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided February 7, 2012No. 01-12-00110-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion issued February 7, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-12-00110-CR

———————————

IN RE RONALD WAYNE SCHOFIELD, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Ronald Wayne Schofield, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator complains that respondent* has not ruled on his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc to grant him additional pre-sentence jail time credit.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schofield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API