Legal Opinion

Compaq Computer Corporation & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 28, 2001No. 00-60648PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

In this case, Compaq Computer Corporation engaged in a foreign stock transaction involving the purchase and resale of American Depository Receipts (ADRs). The Tax Court held that because the ADR transaction lacked economic substance, the transaction should be disregarded for federal income tax purposes. 113 T.C. 214, 1999 WL 735238 (1999). The Eighth Circuit recently decided the same question and concluded as a matter of law that ADR transactions of the sort at issue here have economic substance and a business purpose. We agree with the Eighth Circuit’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Rice's Toyota World, Inc. (Formerly Rice Auto Sales, Inc.) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Duffie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. Klamath Strategic Investment Fund Ex Rel. St. Croix Ventures v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. Kornman & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Jade Trading, LLC ex rel. Ervin Capital, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & Erisa Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API