Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fellers v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 25, 1977No. 48794Published

1DissentSimms, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

This was an action based on negligence, not breach of a custom. Plaintiff’s lawsuit was based upon defendant’s alleged failure to design, construct and maintain its crossing and a suitable warning device in the manner that a reasonable and prudent railroad would have done in the same circumstances.

Plaintiff’s expert, Gerald Cysewski, was offered for the sole purpose of stating facts regarding the criteria promulgated by the American Association of Railroads for the design, construction and maintenance of crossings and suitable warning and safety devices. This testimony…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Nordstrom v. White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Boston and Maine Railroad v. Isabelle C. Talbert, AdministratrixCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. Jorgensen v. HortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. McComish v. DeSoiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API