Legal Opinion

Milton I. Schwartz Nina Schwartz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 21, 1995No. 94-15685PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

On their 1976 tax return Milton I. Schwartz and Nina Schwartz reported an ordinary loss of $208,675. This loss was generated by an options straddle. The Sehwartzes reported the other end of the straddle, a capital gain of $180,840, on their 1978 tax return.

The tax court disallowed the 1976 deduction in 1983, on the ground the straddle was a sham transaction. The Sehwartzes paid the resulting deficiency in their 1976 tax, and claimed a refund of the capital gains tax they paid on the gain they reported in 1978.

When the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Glass v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  5. John E. Keane, Dorothy M. Keane v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re: James Kenneth FeilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Pcce, Inc. v. United States of America Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Beaudry Motor Co., an Arizona Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Estate of Harrah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Zeier v. United States Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API