Legal Opinion
State v. Schuster
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1993No. 17855PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*567AMUNDSON, Justice.
Shawn Schuster (Schuster) appeals from his conviction of felony rape as defined in SDCL 22-22-1(2).1 We affirm.
FACTS
On Friday, May 10, 1991, twenty-three year old Schuster drove sixteen-year old D.T., her boyfriend Brian Meyers (Meyers), and Norman Schnitger (Schnitger) to a party at Orman Dam. Although D.T. was sixteen years old, the evidence showed her to have the mental capacity of only an eight or nine year old.
At some point in the evening, Schuster and D.T. left the party and moved to another location along the shore of the reservoir. Next, Schuster removed D.T.’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Harold S. Alston v. Walter Redman, Warden Charles M. Oberly, Iii, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- State v. StangaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. DeNoyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.