Legal Opinion

McGlamry v. Voytek

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 1995No. 95-0008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). The appellant claims that he did not receive proper notice of a hearing on his motion to hold appellee in contempt for failure to provide him the agreed visitation with his daughter. At a hearing set by appellee to strike the case from a trial calendar, the trial court ruled on the earlier filed motion for contempt. We are advised by appellant himself that he testified as to the matter of visitation and thus the issues were addressed at the hearing. It is appellant’s duty to provide this court with a record…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pb v. Dept. of Children & Family Services.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API