Bandemer v. Davis
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1DissentPell, Senior Circuit Judge
I concur in the majority’s conclusion that defendants, by designing and implementing the present redistricting plan, did not discriminate against NAACP plaintiffs in violation of either the Fifteenth Amendment or section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. I dissent, however, from the majority’s decision that defendants violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by drawing a redistricting plan that diluted Bandemer plaintiffs’ and NAACP plaintiffs’ voting strength as Democrats. Because I dissent from the majority’s determination that defendants’ plan constituted an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.