Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bandemer v. Davis

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided December 13, 1984No. IP 82-56-C, IP 82-164-CPublished

1DissentPell, Senior Circuit Judge

I concur in the majority’s conclusion that defendants, by designing and implementing the present redistricting plan, did not discriminate against NAACP plaintiffs in violation of either the Fifteenth Amendment or section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. I dissent, however, from the majority’s decision that defendants violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by drawing a redistricting plan that diluted Bandemer plaintiffs’ and NAACP plaintiffs’ voting strength as Democrats. Because I dissent from the majority’s determination that defendants’ plan constituted an…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API