Nu-Lite Electrical Wholesalers, Inc. v. Colonial Electric
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRISBAUM, Judge.
This appeal relates to a suit by a materi-alman against the general contractor and its surety. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, defendants appeal. We affirm.
The basic record facts and procedural history are well-known to all parties and need not be repeated.
We are called upon to decide two basic questions:(1) Whether the trial court was “clearly wrong” in finding that the materials (represented by the invoices) for which it rendered judgment became “component parts of the immovable” or were “consumed at the site of the immovable” as provided by La.R.S. 9:4802(A)(3)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coignet v. DeubertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Haynesville Lumber Co. v. CaseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Welch v. Robert Campbell, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Allen B. Cambre Lumber & Supply Co. v. LoomisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Security Homestead Ass'n v. SchnellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fidele v. Crescent Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Gilchrist v. Ozone Spring Water Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- NU-LITE ELEC. WHOLE., INC. v. Colonial Elec.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988