Legal Opinion

Grady v. Corbin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1990No. 89-474Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

495 U.S. 508 (1990)

GRADY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DUTCHESS COUNTY

v.

CORBIN

No. 89-474.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 21, 1990

Decided May 29, 1990

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK

Bridget R. Steller argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was William V. Grady, pro se.

Richard T. Farrell argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Stephen L. Greller and Ilene J. Miller.

2Opinion of the Court · BrennanJustice Brennan

We have long held, see Blockburger v. United States, 284 U. S. 299, 304 (1932), that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment[1] prohibits successive prosecutions for…

Also in this document: Dissent · O'Connor; Dissent · Scalia.

3Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API