Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Starrett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1960No. 38401PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

The insurance contract provides that it "does not apply to any business pursuits of an insured except (a) in connection with the conduct of a business of which the named insured is the sole owner.” Since it appears from the manner in which the plaintiff designates himself that he as an individual is doing business as Starrett Plumbing Company, injuries resulting from his carrying on of this trade, if otherwise within the policy provisions, are not excluded because done in the course of a trade or business, the word business being defined to include a trade, profession, or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hodges v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Virginia Engineering Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  3. Board of Trade Livery Co. v. Georgia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. The LIFE & CAS. INS. CO. &C. v. BenionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Dean v. McLeanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. White v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Weeg v. Iowa Mutual Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. AMERICAN CAS. CO. OF PENN. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Karadis Ptg. Co. v. Penn. Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  5. Shelby Insurance v. FordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API