Tilley v. Page
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBenham, Judge
While I concur in Divisions 1, 2, and 3 of the majority opinion, I must respectfully dissent as to Division 4, since I consider it to be a headlong rush to give the nolo contendere plea the coup de grace.
The issue brought into focus by Division 4 is whether a nolo contendere plea should be admissible in a civil action for impeachment purposes. Were I writing merely for the moment I would have little difficulty in siding with the majority, but since I write for posterity, my vision must be future-oriented.
The legislature in its wisdom spoke emphatically on the effect of a nolo contendere plea:…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Favors v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Benefield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Whitley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Hightower v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Beach v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.