Legal Opinion
Young v. That Was the Week That Was
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 9, 1969No. C 65-268PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBROS, District Judge.
This is a class action. Plaintiffs sue on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated. The defendants are certain organizations and individuals associated with the television program “That Was The Week That Was.”
The plaintiffs have named as a defendant the program itself. They have named the National Broadcasting Company and Westinghouse Broadcasting Company, both of which televised the program. They have named the Colgate-Palmolive Company, P. Lorrilard Company, and the Caryl Richards Cosmetics, Inc., all of which…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Sidis v. FR Pub. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Smith v. DossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Metter v. Los Angeles ExaminerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Brauer v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Bazemore v. Savannah HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Romaine v. KallingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- In Re" Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Wiggins v. Equifax Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Fay Young and Forrest Young v. That Was the Week That Was A/K/A Tw-3Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Morgan v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.