Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bauberger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 2006No. COA04-1368Published

1DissentGeer, Judge

A lynchpin of our judicial system is the principle that the jury will only apply the law as described by the trial judge. A jury is not per*475mitted to engage in a private investigation of the law or to consult outside sources to untangle what the trial judge meant in his instructions. Yet, that is precisely what the jury did in this criminal case. Because I believe defendant was prejudiced by the jury’s consideration of extraneous material and, therefore, is entitled to a new trial, I respectfully dissent.

I recognize that in Lindsey v. Boddie-Noell Enters., Inc., 355 N.C. 487, 562 S.E.2d 420…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Salvatore Joseph Marino v. Dan Vasquez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. State v. RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. CopelandUtah Supreme Court · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API