Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1994No. 60222-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

124 Wn.2d 26 (1994)

873 P.2d 498

WILLIAM WEYERHAEUSER, ET AL, Respondents,

v.

PIERCE COUNTY, ET AL, Appellants.

No. 60222-1.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

May 26, 1994.

Eisenhower & Carlson, by Charles K. Douthwaite, Special Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant Pierce County.

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, by Daniel D. Syrdal and Polly L. McNeill, for appellants Land Recovery, et al.

Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, by William T. Lynn and Annette Thompson, for respondents.

BRACHTENBACH, J.

This is an appeal from a superior court decision invalidating a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API