Legal Opinion

Doranso v. Doranso

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1931No. Docket No. 22, Calendar No. 35,528PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, C. J.

Plaintiff charged defendant with cruelty and nonsupport in a bill for separate maintenance, and subsequently in an amended bill for absolute divorce. Defendant in his answer denied the charges, and in a cross-bill charges plaintiff with cruelty and intimates infidelity. He also asks for an absolute divorce. The parties have no children. They formerly lived in northern Michigan and came to Detroit where defendant after working in an automobile factory secured a position with the police force. Plaintiff claims that defendant began to treat her with indifference and cruelty, and finally one day…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chase v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API