Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Mason

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1869PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. William A. Portee, Judge, presiding. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

This was an action of assumpsit brought by appellant against appellees, on two promissory notes executed by the latter to John McCalla on the 1st of October, 1857, for $1,700 each. One fell due in ten months, and the other in twenty-two months. The notes upon their face drew twelve per cent, interest per annum. They were so described in the declaration, and they were assigned to appellant. The plea of non assumpsit was filed. A trial was had by the court, a jury having been waived by consent of the parties. After hearing the evidence, the court deducted all of the interest, and credits for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stockham v. MunsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. BresslerIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Davis v. TandyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. McDougall v. KasiskaIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Simmons v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  5. Ehrler v. WorthenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API