Legal Opinion
Alcorn v. Gieseke
California Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1910No. Sac. No. 1693PublishedCited by 15 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action was brought to quiet the title of plaintiffs to the northeast quarter of section 27, township 2 south, range 5 east, Mt. Diablo base and meridian, situated in San Joaquin County. Judgment went for defendant and plaintiffs appeal therefrom, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The plaintiffs deraign title to two thirds of the land in controversy as heirs at law of one Joseph McKinney, deceased, and as to the other third by virtue of a deed from one Dudley Sebree, the only other heir at law.
Some of the conceded facts in the case are that Joseph McKinney died in San…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alcorn v. BuschkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- In re Estate of LetellierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Alcorn v. BrandemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shields v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Colbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Arnold v. MorrisseyMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Estate of HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Moore v. KeeseyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.