Legal Opinion

In re B.R.F.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1984No. 46519PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus initiated by B.S.G., the maternal grandmother of B.R.F., a minor. The grandmother contends she was awarded the legal custody of B.R.F. by an order of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, Burlington County, New Jersey (New Jersey Court).1 She also contends the natural father of B.R.F. is violating her right to custody by having taken physical custody of B.R.F. and refusing to return B.R.F. to her. We issued the writ, and, for the reasons which follow, we find the writ lies and order the father, F.F., to return the physical…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. May v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lemley v. BarrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. J.D.S. v. FranksArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Interest of AEHWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re CifarelliSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. State Ex Rel. Laws v. HigginsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API