Legal Opinion

Van Eycken v. Van Eycken

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered October 27, 1978, and in which the plaintiff wife seeks entry of a money judgment for child support arrears and to modify the custody provisions of the parties’ divorce judgment, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Fierro, J.), dated September 17, 1986, as denied his cross motion for a protective order.

Ordered that the order is modified, by deleting the provisions thereof which denied those branches of the defendant’s cross motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nitz v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Oppenheimer v. ShubitowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Capoccia v. BrognanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Serdaroglu v. SerdarogluAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Lapidus v. HiltzikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Lisa C.-R v. William R.New York Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Krygier v. Airweld, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API