Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1917No. 4365Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

The effect of appellant's contention, under his assignment relating to the change of venue, is that the District Court in Bexar County, in which his case was tried, was not a court of competent jurisdiction, and that any judgment it might render either acquitting or convicting appellant would be void. If the court was without jurisdiction of the subject matter, then it could render no judgment binding either upon the State or the defendant. White's C.C.P., sec. 539, p. 367; McLain v. State,31 Tex. Crim. 558; McNeal v. State, 29 Texas Crim. App., 48; Leach v. State, 36 Tex.Crim. Rep..

There is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Haysler v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. State v. PotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Leyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Maton v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1854

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API