Legal Opinion
Deters v. Hammer
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 19, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00362Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ERIC C. DETERS Case No. 1:20-cv-00362 Plaintiff, Black, J. v. Bowman, M.J. MATTHEW HAMMER, et al., Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Eric Deters, proceeding pro se, initiated this action on October 19, 2020 by filing a complaint against Matthew Hammer and Mr. Hammer’s current law firm.1 Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Hammer is liable for defamation and false light under Ohio law, and that Defendant McKenzie & Snyder, LLP is vicariously liable for Hammer’s commission of those torts. (Doc. 1). Pursuant to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.