Legal Opinion
(SS) Ronquillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 17, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01665Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVINA IRENE RONQUILLO, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-1665 JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL AND ) AFFIRMING THE ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION 13 v. ) (Doc. 17) ) 14 ANDREW SAUL, ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN Commissioner of Social Security, ) FAVOR OF DEFENDANT, THE COMMISSIONER 15 ) OF SOCIAL SECURITY, AND AGAINST Defendant. ) PLAINTIFF DAVINA IRENE RONQUILLO 16 17 Davina Irene Ronquillo asserts she is entitled to supplemental security income under Title XVI 18 of the Social Security Act.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Valentine v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ellen L. Jones v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.