Legal Opinion
Barden Detroit Casino, L.L.C. v. City of Detroit
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 22, 1999No. 2:99-cv-72655PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR IN-JUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSEN, District’Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On May 25, 1999, Plaintiff, Barden Detroit Casino, L.L.C. (“BDC”) initiated the instant lawsuit against the above-captioned State and Detroit Defendants challenging, inter alia, the constitutionality of the Casino Development Competitive Selection Process, Detroit City Code § 18-13-1, et seq. (the “Ordinance”), and the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act, M.C.L.A. § 432.201, et seq. (the “Act”), which govern the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barden Detroit Casino, L.L.C., a Michigan Limited Liability Company v. The City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Climax Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
- Crestmark Bank v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Hauf v. LIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATIONDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- FONTANA v. Lincoln Park Police Department, a Michigan Municipal CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022