Legal Opinion

McCadden v. Slauson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

The defendant in error, Samuel Slauson, recovered a judgment in the Circuit Court of Shelby County against the appellant, MeCadden, for the sum of $273.32, upon the following note:

“$2,000 Ottawa, Ohio, October 14, 1889.
“Sixty days after date, we, or either of us, promise to pay to the Ottawa Exchange Bank (Samuel Slauson) or order, two thousand dollars, value received, payable at said bank. If not paid at maturity, to bear 8 per cent, interest.
“And we hereby authorize and empower any attorney at law of any Court of record in Ohio, or elsewhere in the United States, at any time after this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fitzsimmons v. MarksNew York Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamm v. HammCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  2. Brown v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API