Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Giles v. Scott

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1927No. 26,027PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

The relator is an honorably discharged soldier and within the provisions of L. 1919, p. 194, c. 192 (G. S. 1923, §§ 4368, 4369), known as the soldiers preference act. He is employed in the classified service of the fire department of the city of St. Paul, which service is subject to the civil service provisions of the city charter. He passed the examination for promotion to the position of engineer and his name was placed on the list of those eligible for appointment to that position. Under the civil service rules the names of those eligible for such positions are placed on the list…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Schultz v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kangas v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Durst v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Abati v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API