Kronmiller v. Caruso
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
57 N.J. Super. 331 (1959)
154 A.2d 739
GEORGE KRONMILLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MARY LOU CARUSO AND ROBERT W. SUTHERLAND, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 5, 1959.
Decided October 13, 1959.
Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and SCHALICK.
Mr. Robert M. Graham argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Ferrara and Guez, attorneys).
Mr. Paul J. O'Neill argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.
This case comes before us on an agreed statement of facts pursuant to R.R. 1:6-3 and R.R. 2:6.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Evtush v. the Hudson Bus Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Interchemical Corp. v. Uncas Printing & Fin. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Abbatemarco v. ColtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- Battershell v. Bowman Dairy Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Webber v. McCormickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Falcone v. NJ Bell Tel. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Joseph Toker, Inc. v. CohenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Reilly v. SPIEGELHALTERNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968