Legal Opinion

Trimount Dredging Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 14, 1935No. 42308PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

This case arises under a contract entered into between plaintiff and the United States for dredging a certain area in Fore Fiver, Portland Harbor, Maine. Plaintiff was required to furnish all labor and material, perform all work required, and was to be paid 32 cents a cubic yard for the material removed. The specifications mentioned the fact that a certain railroad bridge which spanned the area to be dredged had recently been removed and also stated that “ The material to be removed is believed to be soft mud and soft clay with some broken pile ends in the site of the old railroad bridge, but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. MacArthur Brothers Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Sanford & Brooks Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  3. Ranieri v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  4. Hampton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  5. Flippin Materials Company, a Joint Venture Composed of Brown and Root, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API