Legal Opinion

Woodard v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2012No. 06-CF-1134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Senior Judge:

A partly reconstituted division of the court granted rehearing in this case to reconsider our previous holding that the prosecutor’s closing argument did not foster a misleading impression by the jury, sufficient to warrant reversal, of the credibility of an important government witness. See Woodard v. United States, 1 A.3d 371, 376 (D.C.2010). We now hold that the argument in question might well have improperly bolstered the witness’s credibility in jurors’ minds, and that because the trial judge declined to adopt a corrective measure reasonably proposed by the defense,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. Chake G. Kojayan, United States of America v. Hratch Meguerdity KalfayanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brian K. Gilliam, John A. Daniels, and Ronald L. English v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. CHARLES M. COATES v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Freeman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API