Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 1938No. 19624PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Christian, Judge.

The offense is theft by false pretext; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

In applying the law of theft by false pretext to the facts the court instructed the jury that if they believed from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that property belonging to the injured party of the value of fifty dollars came into the possession of the appellant by a false pretext they would find appellant guilty. In his exception to the charge appellant pointed out the particulars in which it was inadequate.

We quote from Barnett v. State, 43 S. W. (2d) 449, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoovel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Draper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Redding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Roe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Rummel v. EstelleDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API