Legal Opinion

Rose v. Pace

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1926No. 25823PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMciGtowen, J.

The appellee, Daniel Ryan Pace, recovered a judgment against appellant, E. L. Rose, for one thousand dollars1 for personal injuries sustained by appellee while employed as a laborer at a sawmill. Ilis duty was to operate that part of the machinery which brought logs from the log yard up an incline to the mill; machinery consisting of a drum or windlass, with large wheel, which would pull all the logs upon the platform to he transported to the saw. A friction wheel applied against the drum would cause the drum to turn and wind the steel cable on the drum, and it had iron bolts which projected…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. SaffoldMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Ovett Land & Lumber Co. v. AdamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goodyear Yellow Pine Co. v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Jones v. Greer Rice Dryer & Shop, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API