Legal Opinion

Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 11, 1990No. Court No. 89-04-00172Published

1Opinion of the Court

DiCarlo, Judge:

Defendant-intervenors challenge the amended results of the remand ordered in Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works Ltd. v. United States, 14 CIT 37, 729 F. Supp. 1365 (1990) (Kejriwal I). In Kejriwal I, the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration was directed to; 1) correct computer input errors, 2) correct its failure to deduct several Indian taxes from the calculation of constructed value, 3) either explain how it arrived at the tonnage figures used to calculate the rebate provided under India’s International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS) or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  3. Sharp Corp., and Toshiba Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  5. Kejriwal Iron and Steel Works, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API