State v. Brand

Defendant was convicted on the charge of having represented himself as a duly authorized practicing physician and surgeon, and prosecutes an appeal from the judgment.

The information on which the conviction was had, after formal parts, recites that the prosecuting attorney within and for the city of St. Louis, on behalf of the State of Missouri, informs the court, etc. Then follows the precise charge laid against defendant, towit:

*28“That Charles Brand, in the city of St. Louis, on the 12th day of March, 1908, being not then and there a regularly licensed physician or surgeon and holding no…