Arcuri v. Village of Remsen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Following construction of a new sewer system, the Village of Remsen (Village) enacted Local Laws, 1991, No. 2 establishing a "user unit” classification system for sewer capital charges *992and sewer rents. Thereafter, plaintiff, the owner of five multiunit apartment buildings located in the Village, commenced this action challenging Local Law No. 2 as illegal, invalid and unconstitutional. Supreme Court denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Pless v. Town of RoyaltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Pless v. Town of RoyaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Kinkead v. Village of Round LakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Pearl Leather Finishers, Inc. v. Gloversville-Johnstown Joint Sewer BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Welch Foods, Inc. v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Frontier Insurance v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hull v. Town of WarrensburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Frontier Insurance v. Town Board of ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Rezek v. Village of RichmondvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.