Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Mann

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1905No. 5,512PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Erom Fountain Gircuit Oourt; Joseph M. Babb, Judge. Suit by Ephraim L. Mann and another against Frederick B. Gardner and another. Erom a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

The purpose of this action is to rescind, cancel and set aside an executed contract for the exchange of lands, on account of misrepresentations alleged to have been made by appellant Frederick B. Gardner to appellees. Demurrers to the complaint were overruled, and appellants answered in general denial. ' The issue thus formed was submitted to the court, trial had, special findings, and conclusions of law thereon stated. The separate motion of *696Gardner for a venire de novo was overruled, and judgment was rendered on the findings in favor of appellees.

Appellants contend that the court erred in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Knappen v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Franklin v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Koehlinger v. State Lottery Commission of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Brown v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Consolidated Garage & Sales Co. v. DiltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Franklin v. WhiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API