Legal Opinion

Porter v. American Distilling Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 4, 1946No. 23, Docket 20249PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The dismissal of Count 3 only affected certain of the many defendants who were sued jointly upon that count. The orders left Count 3 undisposed of as to various other defendants sued jointly and were not therefore final and hence not appealable. Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co., 148 U.S. 262, 13 S.Ct. 590, 37 L.Ed. 443. Studer v. Moore, 2 Cir., 153 F.2d 902; Hunteman v. New Orleans Public Service, 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 465; cf. Reeves v. Beardall, 316 U.S. 283, 286, 62 S.Ct. 1085, 86 L.Ed. 1478.

Appeals dismissed.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reeves v. BeardallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Hunteman v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Studer v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Porter v. American Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946