Legal Opinion

Miller & Kizer v. Des Moines City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 13, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

Appellee is a copartnership. At the time of the transaction in question, appellee was engaged in operating a motor bus in the city of Des Moines. A collision occurred between said bus and a street car operated by appellant. This action is brought to recover for damages caused to the bus by such collision.

I. It is appellant’s contention that appellee cannot recover in this action because of a claim that appellee was not the owner of the motor bus at the time the action was commenced, or at the time of the trial.

*1035*1034Appellee purchased said motor bus under a conditional bill of sale. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robinson & Co. v. BerkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Swanson v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Erb v. German American InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Carr v. Inter-Urban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Donnelly v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Connelly v. NolteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  2. Menke v. PeterschmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  3. Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
  4. Hansen v. KuhnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  5. Montalvo v. ValdiviesoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API