Legal Opinion
New York Central Railroad v. Talisman, Long Island R.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 6, 1933No. 286PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
This is a suit in admiralty brought by petitioner in the southern district of New York against the tug Talisman, of which respondent is the owner and claimant, to recover damages to earfloat No. 37 belonging to petitioner. The case was submitted on an agreed statement of facts.
Petitioner and respondent were common carriers engaged in interstate commerce. The damages resulted from a collision October 29, 1926, between petitioner’s earfloat No. 58, while in tow of the Talisman, and earfloat No. 37, which was moored in a earfloat bridge of respondent’s terminal at Long Island City. The collision…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. MERCHANTS'BANK.Supreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pacific Railroad v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- York Company v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Palmer v. Agwilines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Burns Bros. v. Long Island R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Cook v. the MV WasaborgDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
- Burns Bros. v. Erie R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1948
- Joseph L. Portwood and Betty Portwood, Individuals, Trading and Doing Business as the Portwood Company v. The Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.