Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 20, 1941No. 7599PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
This is a petition1 to review an order of the Federal Power Commission requiring petitioner to apply for a license to operate and maintain its hydroelectric project in the Susquehanna River near Holtwood, Pennsylvania.2
*157In September, 1938, the Commission issued an order reciting that petitioner was operating and maintaining a hydroelectric project, commonly called the Holtwood Development, across and in the Susquehanna River at McCall’s Ferry near Holtwood, Pennsylvania, and that the river is a navigable water of the United States from and above the plant reservoir (in Pennsylvania) to its…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Montana Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. Of Baltimore (Public Service Commission of Maryland, Intervener)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Niagara Falls Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.