Scattered Corp. v. Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
In this appeal we apply existing law to a stockholder derivative suit where a pre-suit demand was refused. In doing so we explicate the settled legal principles as they apply to these specific facts, holding that the making of a demand waives only any contention that the board was incapable of acting on the demand. A demand does not preclude a plaintiff from alleging with particularity facts creating a reason to doubt that a special committee in investigating the demand or the executive committee of the board in acting on the demand acted independently and in good faith…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Arnold v. Society for Savings Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- White v. PanicSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- McCall v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- In re Trados Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- Harhen v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.