Legal Opinion

Scattered Corp. v. Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 22, 1997No. 344, 1996PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal we apply existing law to a stockholder derivative suit where a pre-suit demand was refused. In doing so we explicate the settled legal principles as they apply to these specific facts, holding that the making of a demand waives only any contention that the board was incapable of acting on the demand. A demand does not preclude a plaintiff from alleging with particularity facts creating a reason to doubt that a special committee in investigating the demand or the executive committee of the board in acting on the demand acted independently and in good faith…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  3. Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Arnold v. Society for Savings Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  5. Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  2. White v. PanicSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  3. McCall v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. In re Trados Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  5. Harhen v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API