Legal Opinion

Mize v. Ownby

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1949PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

The Chancellor held that defendant Ownby had no right to substitute cattle guards for gates on an easement or roadway over the servient estate of complainant Mize for the benefit of the dominant estate of defendant Own-*209by. The Court of Appeals reversed tlie decree of the Chancellor, holding that under the facts the substitution was lawful and proper. The cause is here on petition for certiorari.

Complainant and defendant hold titles to both tracts of land that stem from a common owner, J. E. Frazier, who, on January 1, 1915, sold 140 acres to defendant’s predecessors in title. Following the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guillet v. LivernoisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Hammond v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Luster v. GarnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Long v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. White v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cooper v. PolosCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Miller v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  4. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API