Legal Opinion
McDaniel v. Cage Crow
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 2, 1918No. 8769PublishedCited by 3 opinions
■ Appeal from Erath County Court; W. E. Bower, Judge. Suit by Cage & Crow against W. O. McDaniel. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant-appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
This suit was brought by ap-pellees, a banking partnership, against appellant on the following guaranty:
“Cage & Crow, Bankers, Stephenville, Texas —Gentlemen: You are the owners of a certain note for $107.50, dated December 27, 1913, due October 1, 1914, signed by H. L. McDaniel and payable to the order of-⅛ together with interest from date, and for and in consideration of the extension of said note by you as agreed upon, which is to be paid by my son out of his wages for cotton seed hauling, and in such consideration I hereby guarantee you the payment of said note in full on January 1, 1915,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Tarkinton v. C. E. Broussard & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1879
- Rose v. San Antonio & Mexican Gulp RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1868
- Porter v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1852
- Greer v. Richardson Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wasson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Robuck v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Swilley v. City Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926