Legal Opinion

Hobson v. Satterlee

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 3, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

The only question presented by the exceptions in this case is whether a plaintiff is entitled to judgment, as mat*403ter of law, on the overruling of a demurrer to the declaration. The plaintiff contends that at common law a judgment would follow as a matter of course in such a case, and that this court has declared in Montague v. Boston & Fairhaven Iron Works, 97 Mass. 502, that this law in respect of demurrers has not been changed by the Practice Act. It is needless to say that no such declaration was made. In the case referred to, Mr. Justice Chapman, speaking of the words “ and in like manner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montague v. Boston & Fairhaven Iron WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Young v. GillesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Middleby v. EfflerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API