Buck, Admr. v. Rutland R.R. Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The plaintiff, as administrator, sues to recover damages for the death of Janice Buck, who was killed by the defendant’s train at the so-called Moulthrop Avenue crossing in the city of Rutland. Verdict and judgment were for the defendant. The plaintiff excepts.
Moulthrop Avenue is a public highway extending as it was laid out, westerly from South Main Street to the east line of, but not across the defendant’s right of way, and then from the west line of that right of way on to the west. How, if at all, this unusual situation affects the character of this crossing, or the defendant’s duty…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Emmons v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Landry v. HubertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Stewart v. Portland Ry. L. & P. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Winifred Brothers' Administrator v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
- Seeley v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shea v. PiletteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Bennett v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- Pfeifer v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1952
- Leedom v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1942
- Wright v. GodinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.