Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1954No. 1045PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Arthur Thomas, defendant-appellant' herein, was convicted of the murder of one Janie Miskovich and the death penalty was imposed. He has appealed from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial contending that the proceedings were not fair and impartial nor in accordance with law.

Before setting forth the pertinent facts adduced at the trial we shall consider sever al preliminary matters which the defendant assigns as error.

Motion for Continuance

On April 17, 1953 (all of the events herein mentioned occurred during the year 1953) the case was set for trial on…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Shanks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. State v. McLainArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Burgunder v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State v. CourseyArizona Supreme Court · 1950

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Thomas v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. State v. BeatyArizona Supreme Court · 1988

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API